State v. Ebinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that jury was properly permitted to consider the defendant’s alcohol intake and its effect upon his behavior
• “Whether [a] defendant failed to become aware of a 'substantial and unjustifiable risk’ is determined by an objective test, not by reference to the defendant’s subjective perception.”
• evidence of defendant’s alcohol consumption was relevant to charge of criminally negligent vehicular homicide even if the evidence was insufficient to convict him of causing the death of another while driving under the influence of alcohol
• defendant was intoxicated and traveling in a breakdown lane

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Littlefield v. Acadia Insurance
  First Circuit· 2004-12-08· cited 90×
• State v. Littlefield
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-06-16· cited 46×
• State v. Pittera
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-12-28· cited 34×
• State v. Shepard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-05-29· cited 9×
• State v. Demond-Surace
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-05-12· cited 8×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-16· cited 8×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-02-13· cited 8×
• State v. O'Flynn
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-07-01· cited 5×