State v. Ebbing
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 865
Syllabus
After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issues with arguable merit for appellant to advance on appeal. Based on the facts and law involved, no responsible contention can be made that any part of appellant's plea or sentence offers a basis for reversal. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An order denying exceptions to a magistrate’s report is a non-final order and not directly appealable.”
- “The trial court’s denial of the [petitioners’] timely exceptions without a hearing deprived them of due process and constituted a departure from the essential requirements of the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.