Nevada Supreme Court· 12/10/1985
State v. Eaton
Citations
- 710 P.2d 1370
- 101 Nev. 705
- 1985 Nev. LEXIS 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court properly subtracted the amount the plaintiff received for releasing other co-defendants before reducing the jury verdict to the statutory maximum
- recognizing a “bystander” cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress
- allowing for potential separate damage awards against the State for the mother’s personal injury, wrongful death of her baby, and for the mother’s claim for emotional distress
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mowbray, Springer, Gunderson, Steffen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 248×
- Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 153×
- Chowdhry v. NLVH, INC.Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-05-07· cited 117×
- Brown v. Alliance Real Estate GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1999-02-09· cited 85×
- Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc. v. KavorkianAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-10-31· cited 62×
- County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical Center v. UpchurchNevada Supreme Court· 1998-07-27· cited 52×
- Grotts v. ZahnerNevada Supreme Court· 1999-12-13· cited 42×
- Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. YeghiazarianNevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-07· cited 27×
- BUCK BY BUCK v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-11-27· cited 24×
- Frances v. Plaza Pacific Equities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 24×
- Badillo v. American Brands, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-01-30· cited 24×
- Stump v. Ashland, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-11-24· cited 23×
- Smith v. CloughNevada Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 22×
- Coty v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court· 1992-09-03· cited 20×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. HillNevada Supreme Court· 1998-09-01· cited 18×
- Graves v. EstabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-03-03· cited 16×
- Crippens v. Sav on Drug StoresNevada Supreme Court· 1998-07-28· cited 10×
- Coughlin v. Tailhook Ass'n, Inc.D. Nevada· 1993-04-06· cited 9×
- Hallett v. United States Department of NavyD. Nevada· 1994-04-18· cited 9×
- Rollins Ex Rel. Estate of Rollins v. Peterson Builders, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1991-01-10· cited 8×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 1,026×
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-27· cited 441×
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-11· cited 424×
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-04-24· cited 302×
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-29· cited 279×
- Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals· 1984-02-23· cited 247×
- Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 210×
- Corso v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 144×
- Landreth v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-08-22· cited 138×
- Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 138×
- Dziokonski v. BabineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-06-30· cited 122×
- Keck v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court· 1979-04-05· cited 121×
- Barnhill v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-01-14· cited 113×
- Ramirez v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-12-21· cited 109×
- Star v. RabelloNevada Supreme Court· 1981-03-20· cited 101×
- D'Ambra v. United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1975-05-21· cited 84×
- Culbert v. Sampson's Supermarkets Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-04-30· cited 83×
- Stadler v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 71×
- State v. SilvaNevada Supreme Court· 1970-12-28· cited 68×
- Dawson v. GarciaTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-01-17· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.