Skip to main content

State v. Earnest

Citations

  • 744 P.2d 539
  • 106 N.M. 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the accomplice’s statement was reliable because it was given without a promise of leniency, was against his penal interest, was not blame-shifting, and there was independent evidence corroborating his description of certain events
  • holding that the accomplice's statement was reliable because it was given without a promise of leniency, was against his penal interest, was not blame-shifting, and there was independent evidence corroborating his description of certain events
  • similarly unpersuasive ipse dixit applying the carry-over rule with no analysis or justification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scarborough, Sosa, Stowers, Walters, Ransom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.