State v. Early
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 833
Syllabus
Temporary protection order; expired; effective assistance of counsel; due process; fair trial; sufficiency; abduction; new trial. Appellant's conviction for abduction was supported by sufficient evidence where the appellant, without permission, drove off in the victim's car with the victim's child present in the backseat. Appellant was denied a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel when his counsel failed to object or recognize that the temporary protection order that the State used in support of its case had expired prior to the alleged commission the offenses. Appellant is entitled to a new trial.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 2,402×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 160×
- People v. PughIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-11-29· cited 112×
- State v. BondOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-23· cited 65×
- State v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-15· cited 28×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-10· cited 18×
- Smith v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-07-12· cited 14×
- State v. GuffieOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-06· cited 12×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-25· cited 2×
- State v. HarrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.