Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/23/2008
State v. Earl
Citations
- 177 P.3d 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court may limit the scope of its inquiry where the moving party does not satisfy its burden of proving juror misconduct or prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-07-06· cited 40×
- State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-23· cited 15×
- State v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-30· cited 6×
- State Of Washington, V. Robert Jesse HillCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-28· cited 2×
- State of Washington v. Ricardo Juarez DeleonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-23
- State Of Washington, V Devennice Antoine GainesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-07-06
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GreiffWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 230×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1997-05-20· cited 123×
- United States v. ReskoThird Circuit· 1993-08-24· cited 114×
- Stockton v. VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1988-07-22· cited 103×
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-10· cited 86×
- State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-14· cited 70×
- State v. LemieuxWashington Supreme Court· 1968-12-19· cited 41×
- State v. BolingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-01-26· cited 22×
- State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-24· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.