Skip to main content

State v. Dyer

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8758
  • 100 N.E.3d 993

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant was convicted of menacing, a fourth-degree misdemeanor. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant from presenting evidence of the complainant's (his ex-wife) prior domestic violence protection order complaints against him, which were either dismissed or resolved in the defendant's favor. The trial court reasonably concluded that the evidence was not admissible under Evid.R. 608(B) or Evid.R. 616(A). Trial court did not abuse its discretion in prohibiting defendant from offering the testimony of witnesses who were not timely disclosed. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.