Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/5/1972
State v. Dye
Citations
- 291 A.2d 825
- 60 N.J. 518
- 1972 N.J. LEXIS 268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when the police raid a crime scene and seize some evidence legally and other evidence illegally, only the legally seized evidence is admissible
- stating that when the police raid a crime scene and seize some evidence legally and other evidence illegally, only the legally seized evidence is admissible
- deferring to the Law Division's determination as to whether the detective charged with installing and maintaining the wiretap warrant, as described in the warrant affidavit, was qualified to do so
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-18· cited 319×
- State v. Kingkamau NantambuSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-04-29· cited 123×
- State v. ShortSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-01-20· cited 73×
- State v. CataniaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-03-16· cited 63×
- State v. Hector Feliciano(074395)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-03-09· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 48×
- State v. PottleOregon Supreme Court· 1984-01-24· cited 32×
- State v. WorthySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-27· cited 28×
- State v. DiazNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-02-27· cited 25×
- State v. SidotiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-08-03· cited 20×
- State v. RodriquezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-04-29· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. LeveilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-24· cited 15×
- State v. BraeunigNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-02-05· cited 15×
- State v. McDermottNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-03-29· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-04· cited 12×
- Shaktman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. MonsrudSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-19· cited 10×
- State v. MolinaroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-01-25· cited 8×
- State v. BeneventoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-12-08· cited 8×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- United States v. Larry KnohlSecond Circuit· 1967-06-22· cited 174×
- Roach v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 173×
- United States v. Eddie David CoxTenth Circuit· 1971-11-23· cited 119×
- United States v. FocarileD. Maryland· 1972-02-22· cited 103×
- United States v. SklaroffS.D. Florida· 1971-02-11· cited 103×
- United States v. KingS.D. California· 1971-11-23· cited 98×
- Monroe v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1956-04-30· cited 98×
- John Milton Addison v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-05-24· cited 84×
- United States v. LaGorgaW.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-12-28· cited 82×
- United States v. Eugene E. ThweattD.C. Circuit· 1970-06-30· cited 66×
- United States v. EscandarS.D. Florida· 1970-11-03· cited 65×
- United States v. ScottDistrict of Columbia· 1971-04-29· cited 63×
- United States v. LetaM.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-10-11· cited 56×
- James Castle v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-06-07· cited 51×
- Vincent D. Todisco v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1962-02-19· cited 48×
- United States v. CantorE.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-05-26· cited 39×
- Woodrow W Cape v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-10-06· cited 37×
- United States of America Ex Rel. James Nickens v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1968-03-05· cited 35×
- United States v. PerilloD. Delaware· 1971-09-02· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.