Nebraska Supreme Court· 1/17/1992
State v. D.W.
Citations
- 239 Neb. 817
- 479 N.W.2d 105
- 1992 Neb. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- one element in considering whether to transfer a case to an Indian tribal court is the doctrine of forum non conveniens
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boslaugh, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Grant, Hastings, Shanahan, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. MejiaTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-08-24· cited 69×
- In Re Interest of CWNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-17· cited 53×
- In Re Adoption of SSIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 32×
- K.E. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-02-29· cited 25×
- Ex parte C.L.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2006-06-23· cited 19×
- In Re the Matter of J.D.M.C.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-09-12· cited 14×
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2009-11-25· cited 13×
- Comanche Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. HovisW.D. Oklahoma· 1994-03-28· cited 8×
- Tubridy v. Iron BearIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 2×
- KE v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-02-29
- In Re JLCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2009-11-25
- Ex Parte CLJCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2006-06-23
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 1,234×
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 1,061×
- In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-06-14· cited 298×
- State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-29· cited 144×
- In Re Interest of JSNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-12-24· cited 142×
- In the Interest of J.R.H.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-11-14· cited 97×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-21· cited 86×
- Application of BertelsonMontana Supreme Court· 1980-09-17· cited 60×
- Matter of Dependency and Neglect of ALSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-14· cited 58×
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, Individually as Parens Patriae to Seth Allan Lewis v. Robert Lewis and Diana LewisTenth Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 54×
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. LewisSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 53×
- In Re KreftMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-02-03· cited 49×
- Weigle v. Devon T.California Court of Appeal· 1988-04-21· cited 46×
- In re T.S.Montana Supreme Court· 1990-11-20· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.