State v. Duychak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court's compliance with one of the alternative methods mandated in Bangert reflects the defendant's understanding of the offense
• concluding that trial court's compliance with one of the alternative methods mandated in Bangert reflects the defendant's understanding of the offense
• observing that the terms “and” and “or” may be interpreted interchangeably if it is consistent with legislative intent
• \A strict reading of the word 'or' should not be undertaken where to do so would render the language of the statute dubious.\
• \and\ and \or\ may be substituted for each other when such a reading is consistent with legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).