Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/27/2019
State v. Dustin
Citations
- 247 Ariz. 389
- 449 P.3d 715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the assessments require a predicate fine, penalty, or forfeiture
- the time payment fee, criminal penalty assessment, and victim rights enforcement assessment require a predicate fine, penalty, or forfeiture
- a probation assessment constitutes a sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-24· cited 40×
- State v. SheavesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-24· cited 22×
- State of Arizona v. Albert Junior LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-04-08· cited 21×
- State v. McDonaghCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-07· cited 21×
- State v. Marquez-SosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-12· cited 14×
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-02-25· cited 11×
- State of Arizona v. Thomas Giles ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.