State v. Durst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing a physician’s testimony in which “[h]e testified that in his opinion, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, the victim’s injuries were caused by a forced entry of the vaginal area by penile penetration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• State v. Peite
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-08-27· cited 45×
• State v. Martinez
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-07· cited 41×
• State v. Eggert
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-20· cited 15×
• State v. Bedard
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-11-04· cited 9×
• State v. Goerig
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-12-03· cited 7×
• State v. Hood
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-02-05· cited 4×
• People v. Herring
  New York Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 4×