Supreme Court of Missouri· 3/13/1972
State v. Dupree
Citations
- 477 S.W.2d 129
- 1972 Mo. LEXIS 1083
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- wherein the court held activities of defendant and third party accomplice were sufficiently interwoven where defendant was present at time of activities and activities of third party also involved defendant's activities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-10· cited 99×
- State v. WickizerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1979-06-29· cited 54×
- State v. GantMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-09-04· cited 25×
- State v. CraneMissouri Court of Appeals· 1977-11-15· cited 16×
- State v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-09-11· cited 16×
- State v. NewlandMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-12-03· cited 11×
- State v. StuckerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1974-12-10· cited 8×
- State v. SimonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-03-09· cited 7×
- State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-08-04· cited 6×
- State v. DouglasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1978-10-30· cited 4×
- State v. SwinneyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1977-10-18· cited 3×
- State v. SpryMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-12-26· cited 3×
- Kansas City v. HelmsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-07-06· cited 2×
- Dupree v. WyrickE.D. Missouri· 1976-05-25· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.