Skip to main content
· 6/30/1905

State v. Duperier

Citations

  • 115 La. 478
  • 39 So. 455
  • 1905 La. LEXIS 683

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal Law — Service oe Jury List-Continuance — New Trial.</p> <p>The fact that on the list of jurors served upon the defendant the Christian names of two of the jurors, instead of being given in full, are given by initials only, and the further fact that one of the names on the same list is that of a man who does not exist, do not constitute irregularities sufficiently serious to justify the postponement of the trial, and still less to set aside the verdict.</p> <p>2. Same — Instructions—Revision.</p> <p>Where a requested special charge is so imperfectly worded that it would be unintelligible to the jury, the judge may refuse to give it on that ground, and is not bound to revise it so as to make it intelligible.</p> <p>3. Same — Trial—Minutes oe Clerk.</p> <p>It is not customary for the clerk to note in his minutes such parts of the trial as the request for a special charge.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality of two statutory provisions was likely to redress plaintiff’s injury
  • finding risk of future civil liability sufficient for standing to seek a declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.