· 9/17/1976
State v. Dupaw
Citations
- 365 A.2d 967
- 134 Vt. 451
- 1976 Vt. LEXIS 700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in deciding whether to apply the exclusionary rule, the question is whether the challenged evidence was discovered through exploitation of an illegality
- noting that in deciding whether to apply the exclusionary rule, the question is whether the challenged evidence was discovered through exploitation of an illegality
- stating that the exclusionary rule applies only insofar as “‘knowledge gained by the Government’s own wrong cannot be used by it.’ ”
- stating that the exclusionary rule applies only insofar as “ ‘knowledge gained by the Government’s own wrong cannot be used by it,’ “ quoting Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States , 251 U.S. 385, 392 (1920)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Smith, Daley, Larrow, Billings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.