State v. Dupas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly considered defendant's postconviction testimony against codefendants pursuant to modification agreement by state and defendant under § 53a-39
• “[i]t was not an abuse of discretion for the court to rely on the horrific nature of [the] crime in denying the defendant’s motion for modification . . . [because] [t]his information was just as relevant at the modification hearing as it was during the defendant’s original sentencing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brelsford
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-07-30· cited 4×
• State v. Dort
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-30
• State v. Riley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-03-10
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-07-28
• State v. Leniart
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-06-14
• State v. Toste
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-04-08
• State v. Riley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-05-05
• State v. Browne
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-05-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baldwin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-01-12· cited 101×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-04· cited 99×
• State v. Preston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 54×
• State v. Rose
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-06-24· cited 47×