State v. Duncan
Citations
- 101 Wash. 542
- 172 P. 915
- 1918 Wash. LEXIS 926
Syllabus
<p>Homicide—Instructions—Premeditated Design. Upon defining murder in the first degree, it is proper to instruct that premeditated design is a mental operation of thinking upon an act before doing it or upon an inclination before carrying it out.</p> <p>Same. It is proper to instruct that malice aforethought or premeditated malice is the intention to unlawfully take life, meditated upon before the act, without any particular fixed time and that but a moment need be taken in the formation of the design.</p> <p>Same—Presumptions and Burden of Proof—Degrees. Upon a prosecution for murder, it is proper to instruct that, if the killing is proved beyond, a reasonable doubt, the presumption of law is that it is murder in the second degree, and the burden of proving justification is upon the defendant.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal — Review—Invited Error—Instruction on Alibi. Accused in a prosecution for murder cannot complain of the giving of an instruction upon the subject of alibi, on the theory that alibi was not his defense, where he requested an instruction upon that subject and had introduced evidence to establish an alibi.</p> <p>Same—Harmless Error—Instructions Given. Error cannot be predicated on the refusal to give a requested instruction that was fully covered in the general charge.</p> <p>Same—Instructions—Credibility of Witnesses—Requests. In a prosecution for murder, it is proper to refuse to give precautionary instructions as to the credibility to be given evidence of declarations and statements alleged to have been made by the accused and testified to by witnesses, where other instructions were given to the effect that the jury was the sole judge' of the credibility of the witnesses and should consider their conduct, the reasonableness of their story, etc., and where the statements of the accused referred to, although they showed his relations with deceased and motives of jealousy or revenge, were not strictly in the nature of confessions or admissions of th
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 317×
- State v. MaysWashington Supreme Court· 1964-10-08· cited 40×
- State v. TikkaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-16· cited 20×
- State v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-08· cited 8×
- United States v. SmithThird Circuit· 1946-07-16· cited 6×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. StraubWashington Supreme Court· 1896-12-08· cited 54×
- State v. RuttenWashington Supreme Court· 1895-12-11· cited 49×
- State v. PayneWashington Supreme Court· 1895-01-10· cited 46×
- State v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court· 1897-12-03· cited 38×
- State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1916-02-02· cited 21×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 1910-04-02· cited 16×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-17· cited 14×
- State v. DrummondWashington Supreme Court· 1912-09-17· cited 9×
- White v. SandersWashington Supreme Court· 1917-12-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.