New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/14/2005
State v. Duncan
Citations
- 870 A.2d 307
- 376 N.J. Super. 253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting inference of purpose to harass based on the A-2757-19 17 evidence and common sense and experience
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Newman, Axelrad, and Holston, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-06-06· cited 2,534×
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-06-25· cited 377×
- State v. FrankelSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-05-12· cited 129×
- State v. MortimerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-05-26· cited 80×
- Peterson v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-01-03· cited 67×
- Woodall v. RowlandSupreme Court· 1994-10-31· cited 49×
- Hilvety v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court· 2004-10-04· cited 46×
- State v. Finance American Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-12-09· cited 30×
- Bresocnik v. GallegosNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-02-25· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.