Skip to main content

State v. Duncan

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3003

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's post-conviction motions, which were based on the faulty premise that the sentences imposed by the trial court differed from the sentences contemplated by the plea agreement. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.