Skip to main content

State v. Dunbar

Citations

  • 297 S.W.3d 777
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1613
  • 2009 WL 3837306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court jurisdiction over case is absolute systemic requirement to which ordinary preservation rules are inapplicable
  • recognizing that the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant when an indictment was filed against her but lost personal jurisdiction 30 days after sentencing
  • recognizing that the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant when an indictment was filed against her but lost personal jurisdiction 30 days after sentencing
  • recognizing that the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant when an indictment was filed against her but lost personal jurisdiction 30 days after sentencing
  • recognizing that the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant when an indictment was filed against her but lost personal jurisdiction 30 days after sentencing
  • recognizing that the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant when an indictment was filed against her but lost personal jurisdiction 30 days after sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

215 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.