Skip to main content
· 8/27/1996

State v. Dumot

Citations

  • 82 Haw. 444
  • 922 P.2d 1057
  • 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 266
  • 1996 WL 499333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that BVA decision was issued prior to Thurber and remanding for compliance with Thurber
  • BVA must provide appellant with reasonable notice of any evidence, medical texts or treatises to be relied upon in rendering decision and reasonable opportunity to respond
  • Court noted that BVA decision was issued prior to intervening Court precedents in Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 3 Vet.App. 213 (1992), and Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993), but remanded for BVA to apply those precedents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.