Skip to main content

State v. Dumas

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4602

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for carrying a concealed weapon was supported by sufficient evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error in allowing the police officer to refresh his recollection. Trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to object to the officer's use of his police report to refresh his recollection where no prejudice was established. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.