Texas Supreme Court· 5/17/1911
State v. Duke
Citations
- 137 S.W. 654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that to extent statute is penal, it must sufficiently notify potential wrongdoers ofnature ofillegal behavior
- stating that to extent statute is penal, it must sufficiently notify potential wrongdoers of nature of illegal behavior
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramset
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tigner v. First Nat. Bank of AngletonTexas Supreme Court· 1954-01-27· cited 130×
- Svithiod Singing Club v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court· 1942-11-18· cited 52×
- Railroad Commission v. Texas & New Orleans R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1931-10-14· cited 39×
- Deal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1914-01-20· cited 10×
- Country Club v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1919-06-25· cited 8×
- Crosland v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-03-30· cited 7×
- Waits v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1934-11-08· cited 3×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1948-01-16· cited 3×
- Gulas v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals· 1957-04-23· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. CrowderNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-12-04
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1999-12-30
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1985-12-31
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1983-07-29
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1999-07-02
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1985-07-02
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1983-07-02
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1942-07-02
- State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court· 1911-06-23
- Sprekelsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1915-11-22
- Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S. v. the State of Texas Ex Rels. Christine Ellis, D.D.S. and Madelayne CastilloTexas Supreme Court· 2024-06-21
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Klein v. Livingston ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-10-05· cited 51×
- Marmont v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1874-11-15· cited 39×
- Kentucky Club v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1891-12-03· cited 35×
- People v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court· 1889-02-20· cited 30×
- People v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals· 1889-10-08· cited 18×
- State v. Essex ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1890-11-15· cited 12×
- People v. SinellNew York Supreme Court· 1890-12-10· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Bacon ClubMissouri Court of Appeals· 1891-02-10· cited 6×
- People v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court· 1890-10-23· cited 5×
- United States v. WittigD. Massachusetts· 1876-03-15· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1887-06-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.