Skip to main content
· 10/7/1996

State v. Duk Won Lee

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 1091
  • 83 Haw. 267
  • 1996 Haw. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the prosecution failed to demonstrate the unavailability of witnesses and, thus, the witnesses’ testimonies from a preliminary hearing were inadmissible under the confrontation clause
  • finding that a permissive response to a request to search the defendant resulted only from “inherently coercive” circumstances that were “calculated to overbear [the defendant’s] will”
  • “First, in conformance with the Framers’ preference for face to face confrontation, the [confrontation clause] establishes a rule of necessity. In the usual case (including cases where pri- or cross-examination has occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Ramil, Aiona, Nakayama

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.