State v. Duggar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• iquoting Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co., 336 Mo. 1000, 82 S.W.2d 909, 912 (1934)
• statute making it crime to fail to support minor not vague for failing to define \minor\; common-law understanding was that 21 was age of majority
• statute making it crime to fail to support minor not vague for failing to define “minor”; common-law understanding was- that 21 was age of majority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).