State v. Dudas
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1637
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - Jus Necessitatis court did not err in striking appellant's repetitious motion for postconviction relief pursuant to its prior order motion was otherwise barred by res judicata right to counsel attaches only when adversarial proceedings are initiated against an individual for a particular incident Sixth Amendment right to counsel is offense specific affirmed.
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-08· cited 369×
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 247×
- State v. TenchOhio Supreme Court· 2018-12-26· cited 86×
- Kalish v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-05-11· cited 73×
- State v. LettOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-18· cited 6×
- State v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. HessOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-04· cited 2×
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 2×
- State v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.