Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

State v. Ducker

Citations

  • 27 S.W.3d 889
  • 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 394
  • 2000 WL 968457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, in part, because the defendant’s defense was not inhibited by the error
  • noting this statute could be broken down into two classifications: abuse and neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.