State v. Driver
Citations
- 2024 ND 48
Syllabus
The scope of an opening statement rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and this Court will not reverse a conviction on the ground that the opening statement was prejudicial unless there is a clear abuse of that discretion. Forfeiture is the failure to timely assert a right, which is reviewed for obvious error. The burden to show an obvious error is on the appellant. A denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1967-09-19· cited 30×
- State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-10-28· cited 28×
- State v. White BirdNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-02-12· cited 19×
- State v. WatkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-07-12· cited 15×
- State v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 11×
- State v. RatliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-07-17· cited 10×
- State v. SahNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-12· cited 9×
- State v. KollieNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-08-17· cited 8×
- State v. KnightNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-07-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.