Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/3/2004
State v. Driver
Citations
- 86 P.3d 53
- 192 Or. App. 395
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant's argument that he was denied his right to present a defense under the compulsory process clauses of the Oregon and federal constitutions was not preserved
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GuentherSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-08-09· cited 63×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-19· cited 12×
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 7×
- Adams v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-22· cited 5×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-06· cited 1×
- Driver v. OregonSupreme Court· 2005-01-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.