State v. Driffin
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 804
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening ineffective assistance of appellate counsel Reagan Tokes Law constitutionality future changes in the law forfeiture plain error failure to object. The application to reopen an appeal was denied where the applicant claimed that appellate counsel was ineffective for not challenging the constitutionality of the Reagan Tokes Law because that challenge was not raised in the trial court and this court has found the law to be constitutional.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘The judge’s brief (two-page) memorandum of decision does not constitute findings of fact under Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 52(c
- failure to use the form required by rule 64[b][2] was fatal to the plaintiff’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a jury-waived trial in the Boston Municipal Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.