State v. Dreibelbis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Court may reach issues outside scope of interlocutory appeal “where they are fairly raised by the order appealed” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)
• stating that so long as evidence seized by federal customs officials during routine customs inspection meets federal standards for such searches, that evidence is admissible in state prosecution
• affirming conviction for transporting drugs within state when evidence used was obtained by federal officers using methods consistent with federal standards, although impermissible by Vermont standards
• affirming conviction for transporting drugs within state when evidence used was obtained by federal officers using methods consistent with federal standards, although impermissible by Vermont standards
• trial court’s statement of the question under V.R.A.P. 5(b) is a landmark, not a boundary
• evidence seized in a routine border inspection met federal standards and was admissible in state prosecution even though federal officials were not held to probable cause standards of state police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).