State v. Drake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Pickett court' s definition of residence and holding that there was insufficient evidence that the defendant did not intend to return to his registered address
• Where defendant maintains a residence and intends to return to the residence, the defendant is “under no duty to change his registration to another residence or declare that he had no fixed residence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gentry
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 498×
• State v. Hickman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-30· cited 278×
• State v. Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-01-06· cited 95×
• HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN CTY. v. Pleasant
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-15· cited 56×
• Housing Authority v. Pleasant
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-15· cited 55×
• State v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-03· cited 41×