State v. Drake
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3406
Syllabus
Motion to vacate postrelease control reversal and remand case reinstated at point in which error occurred original sentence statutorily mandated postrelease control delay prejudice laches is not imputable to the government court has inherent right to control docket and trial schedule. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to vacate postrelease control. The term of postrelease control was mandated by statute, and the trial court lacked authority to alter or to eliminate it. Further, appellant was not prejudiced by any delay in adjudicating his case following remand by this court.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 332×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 232×
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 208×
- Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 66×
- State ex rel. Stevenson v. MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-03· cited 65×
- Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. BrennanOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 59×
- Gold Coast Realty, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court· 1971-03-31· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Natl. Elec. Contrs. Assn., Ohio Conference v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-05-31· cited 13×
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29· cited 8×
- State v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.