Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/18/1974
State v. Downes
Citations
- 528 P.2d 110
- 19 Or. App. 401
- 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court not required to hold hearing to allow defendant opportunity to confront state’s witnesses when defendant did not dispute facts underlying suppression motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Foley, Tanzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 121×
- State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 114×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-21· cited 70×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-30· cited 67×
- State v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-07-09· cited 30×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-22· cited 10×
- State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-05-27· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-07-26· cited 4×
- State v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-05-19· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-03-11· cited 76×
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 1974-08-01· cited 44×
- State v. DevineCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-04-21· cited 13×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-09-18· cited 9×
- United States v. DavisN.D. Georgia· 1971-09-02· cited 6×
- Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-10-16· cited 6×
- Culotta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-01-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.