State v. Dowdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where person with common authority over hotel room consented to a search, the defen- dant’s “privacy interest in the room was not violated”
• under Tanner, the defendant’s privacy interests in his personal effects in hotel room were not invaded because police searched hotel room with consent of hotel manager, who had common authority to permit access to the room
• under Tanner, the defendant's privacy interests in his personal effects in hotel room were not invaded because police searched hotel room with consent of hotel manager, who had common authority to permit access to the room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-02-22· cited 7×
• State v. Blasingame
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 2×
• State v. Sargent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 2×
• State v. Gonzalez-Coria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
• State v. Matsen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 57×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-22· cited 25×
• State v. Taggart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-08-06· cited 14×
• State v. Drouhard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-12· cited 14×
• State v. Bonner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-12-22· cited 4×