· 11/11/1905

State v. Douglass

Citations

  • 72 Kan. 673
  • 83 P. 621
  • 1905 Kan. LEXIS 396

Syllabus

<p>1. Information — Motion to Quash. The omission of the word “county” in the title of the officer before whom it was verified did not make the information subject to a motion to quash.</p> <p>2. Practice, Supreme Court — Continuance—Review. The denial of an application to delay a trial on account of absent witnesses, not éxcepted to, was held not reviewable.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.