State v. Douglas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[S]ubsequently-filed informations `will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun.'\
• “[S]ubsequently-filed informations ‘will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Labrador v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 5×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-08· cited 4×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mead v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-03-21· cited 35×
• State v. Adjmi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-12-29· cited 20×
• Adjmi v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1963-05-29· cited 11×
• Douglas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-16· cited 4×