State v. Doucette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an accomplice may be convicted on the basis of overt acts not specifically alleged in an indictment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-10-30· cited 24×
• State v. Craig Michael Sanborn
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-12-18· cited 21×
• State v. Winward
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-02-25· cited 16×
• State v. Jose Batista-Salva
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2019-02-22· cited 14×
• State v. Joseph Kuchman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-04-19· cited 9×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mountjoy
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-03-18· cited 46×
• State v. Seymour
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-03-19· cited 29×
• State v. Monroe
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-06-11· cited 27×
• Quirk v. Town of New Boston
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-08-14· cited 25×
• State v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-12-31· cited 20×
• State v. Greene
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-04-23· cited 20×
• State v. Therrien
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 15×
• State v. Sinbandith
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-05-25· cited 12×
• State v. Hutchinson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-09-16· cited 7×