Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/30/2025
State v. Dotts
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2315
Syllabus
Sulek, J. In an OVI prosecution, defendant's counsel was not ineffective in failing to move for acquittal under Crim.R. 29 or identify a potential witness and the conviction was not against the weight of the evidence.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
- State v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-29· cited 127×
- State v. FendersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-10· cited 16×
- State v. HefflingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-04· cited 4×
- State v. PetittoOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.