State v. Dotterer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• announcing that “[i]t is not enough ... that the imports compete with or affect the ... product indirectly or circuitously,” because Congress intended to protect only those persons and industries displaced by directly competitive imports
• announcing that “[i]t is not enough . . . that the imports compete with or affect the . . . product indirectly or circuitously,” because Congress intended to protect only those persons and industries displaced by directly competitive imports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).