State v. Dotson
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2032
Syllabus
Appellate court's examination of the record following appellate counsel's filing of Anders brief disclosed no non-frivolous issues for review. Although specific elements necessary to prove defendant guilty of the lesser-included offense to which he was entering a plea were not enumerated on the record during the plea hearing, the record demonstrates that defendant, in consultation with counsel, was aware of the nature of the charge and the consequences of his plea, and his guilty plea therefore was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Judgment affirmed. (Welbaum, P.J., concurring in judgment only.)
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
- State v. WheelerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-08· cited 28×
- State v. RiddleOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31· cited 24×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-17· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.