Supreme Court of Missouri· 5/8/1894
State v. Dooley
Citations
- 121 Mo. 591
- 26 S.W. 558
- 1894 Mo. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[R]ight to recapture [is restricted] to such force as was reasonably necessary to effect that purpose, provided it did not extend to the use of a deadly weapon or to an assault likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gantt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 560×
- Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewEighth Circuit· 2013-02-08· cited 368×
- Stubbs v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Missouri· 1902-03-28· cited 52×
- Rhodes v. McWilsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1918-05-30· cited 27×
- People v. ConnorsIllinois Supreme Court· 1912-02-23· cited 26×
- Hickey v. WelchMissouri Court of Appeals· 1901-11-19· cited 25×
- People v. BashicIllinois Supreme Court· 1922-12-19· cited 10×
- Shellabarger v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1906-01-08· cited 7×
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1911-08-16· cited 4×
- State v. LlewellynMissouri Court of Appeals· 1902-04-01· cited 4×
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1907-05-28· cited 3×
- State v. AlsupMissouri Court of Appeals· 1909-12-06· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.