State v. Donovan
Citations
- 28 Del. 40
- 5 Boyce 40
- 90 A. 220
- 1914 Del. LEXIS 7
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law—Attempts to Commit Crime.</p> <p>To constitute an attempt to commit either a statutory or common-law crime, there must be some act done in part execution of the design to commit the crime.</p> <p>2. Arson—Attempts.</p> <p>While the overt act necessary to constitute an attempt to commit a crime need not be the next preceding or proximate act necessary to the consummation of the intended crime, a mere offer of money or solicitation to commit arson is not a sufficient overt act.</p> <p>3. Indictment and Information—Following Language of Statute.</p> <p>An indictment charging that accused attempted to set on fire a certain warehouse, though substantially in the language of the statute was insufficient to plainly and fully inform accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, as required by Const. 1897, art. 1, § 7; it not being sufficient to follow the language of the statute when the elements of the crime are not supplied by the statute, or when recourse must be had to the common law to determine the constituent elements.</p> <p>4. Criminal Law—Offenses—Solicitation.</p> <p>Under Rev. Code 1852, amended to 1893, p. 926, c. 127, § 18, providing that all offenses indictable at common law and not specially provided for by statute shall be misdemeanors, and the statúte making it a felony to maliciously burn or set on fire any warehouse, it is an indictable offense to solicit another to burn or set on fire a warehouse, since it was a misdemeanor at common law to incite or solicit another to commit a felony or other aggravated crime, and page 933, c. 128, making attempts to burn other objects than buildings misdemeanors, was evidently enacted in aid of the common law and for the purpose of embracing things not covered by the common law, and not to constitute a complete code on the subject, and hence does not abrogate the common law on the subject of solicitation.</p> <p>5. Statutes—Construction with Reference to Other Statutes.</p> <p>Statu
Judges: Boyce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. OttoIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-04-09· cited 51×
- Sheeran v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-05-27· cited 48×
- State v. BeckwithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1938-04-27· cited 19×
- McNeill v. TarumianzD. Delaware· 1956-02-24· cited 18×
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1948-03-12· cited 18×
- State v. BiddleDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1950-02-03· cited 15×
- State v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware· 1955-03-07· cited 14×
- State v. BiddleSuperior Court of Delaware· 1950-02-03· cited 12×
- Cohen v. KrigsteinSuperior Court of Delaware· 1955-05-12· cited 12×
- State v. FooteSupreme Court of Delaware· 1933-08-29· cited 12×
- State v. VandenburgNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1938-10-06· cited 12×
- State v. CarusoNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1942-03-25· cited 12×
- State v. BrewerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1921-01-07· cited 11×
- Hollett v. Wilmington Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware· 1934-05-04· cited 9×
- State v. BoyleNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1948-08-30· cited 6×
- State v. BradfordSuperior Court of Delaware· 1936-01-03· cited 5×
- Bank of Delaware v. BancroftCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1970-07-30· cited 4×
- State v. VandenburgNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1938-04-22· cited 4×
- State v. KreugerDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1920-11-22· cited 4×
- Hazzard v. AlexanderSuperior Court of Delaware· 1935-03-04· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court· 1882-04-24· cited 453×
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals· 1903-01-06· cited 204×
- Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1901-01-01· cited 132×
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals· 1894-12-11· cited 104×
- Hicks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1889-06-20· cited 67×
- State v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1828-07-15· cited 44×
- People v. StitesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-04-20· cited 43×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1858-11-15· cited 29×
- Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-05-13· cited 29×
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1887-06-23· cited 21×
- Stabler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1880-10-25· cited 19×
- State v. BallerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1885-06-27· cited 19×
- State v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court· 1906-01-02· cited 19×
- Cox v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-06-15· cited 19×
- In re Receivership Lord & Polk Chemical Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1895-03-15· cited 13×
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1892-02-11· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. RandolphLawrence County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1892-01-04· cited 11×
- State v. LockwoodNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1909-09-30· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.