· 8/26/1986
State v. Domke
Citations
- 392 N.W.2d 645
- 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “no issue concerning the recusal [of the trial judge] has been preserved for [appellate review]” because the appellant “never asked the trial judge to recuse himself’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forsberg, Leslie, Sedgwick, Waived
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.