Skip to main content
· 8/26/1986

State v. Domke

Citations

  • 392 N.W.2d 645
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “no issue concerning the recusal [of the trial judge] has been preserved for [appellate review]” because the appellant “never asked the trial judge to recuse himself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forsberg, Leslie, Sedgwick, Waived

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.