State v. Dominguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that district court must apply intermediate sanctioning scheme in effect when defendant committed crime
• stating 2019 amendment to K.S.A. 22-3716's intermediate sanctioning scheme does not apply retroactively to probation violators whose crimes were committed before the effective date of the amendment
• finding 2019 amendment to intermediate sanctioning scheme— which removed 120-day and 180-day prison sanctions—does not apply retroactively to probation violators who committed crime before amendment's July 1, 2019 effective date
• finding intermediate sanctioning scheme in effect at time original crimes committed applies
• amended intermediate sanction scheme does not apply retroactively to probation violators who committed their crimes before effective date of amendment
• new intermediate sanction scheme does not apply retroactively to probation violators who committed their crimes before the effective date of that amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. McRoberts
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-03-28· cited 7×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-04-10· cited 170×
• White v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-07-06· cited 158×
• State v. Hirsh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-08-02· cited 97×
• State v. Clapp
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-09-07· cited 75×
• State v. Gonzalez-Sandoval
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-12-21· cited 47×
• State v. Tearney
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-12-20· cited 2×