State v. Dolan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Where the defendant did not testify and the prosecutor commented on the defendant’s failure to present logical witnesses, the court stated, “Certainly the prosecution, as an adversary for the state, cannot be prohibited from arguing the strength of its ease to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Napulou
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 23×
• State v. Mitchell
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-03-31· cited 13×
• Town of Columbus v. Harrington
  Montana Supreme Court· 2001-12-11· cited 13×
• State v. Johnson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1982-06-10· cited 9×
• State v. Gladue
  Montana Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 9×
• State v. Swan
  Montana Supreme Court· 1982-08-19· cited 8×
• State v. Bell
  Montana Supreme Court· 1987-01-09· cited 6×
• State v. Kyle
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 1×
• State v. Kyle
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-04-19
• State v. Gladue
  Montana Supreme Court· 1984-01-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• State v. Hamilton
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-01-17· cited 56×
• State v. Kemp
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-07-03· cited 43×
• State v. Armstrong
  Montana Supreme Court· 1976-07-20· cited 24×
• State v. Martinez
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-06-13· cited 19×
• State v. Anderson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1970-11-18· cited 14×
• State v. McKenzie
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 12×
• State v. DeGeorge
  Montana Supreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 10×
• State v. Wogamon
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 9×