State v. Dodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where a defendant challenges the introduction of evidence, he bears the burden to demonstrate that the evidence was prejudicial
• placing burden on defendant to show prejudice where witnesses were observed discussing case in violation of exclusion order
• also noting that defendants should avail themselves of “less drastic means” to limit possible prejudice before moving for a mistrial
• also noting that defendants should avail themselves of “less drastic means” to limit possible prejudice before moving for a mistrial
• construing similar witness exclusion rule under prior rules of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Maestas
  Utah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
• Wilder v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 40×
• Hubbard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-17· cited 26×
• State v. McGrath
  Utah Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 25×
• State v. Carlson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-07-31· cited 20×
• State v. Beltran-Felix
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 14×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Schad
  Utah Supreme Court· 1970-05-21· cited 37×
• State v. Tillman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-01-05· cited 14×
• State v. Vaughn
  Utah Supreme Court· 1976-08-20· cited 4×