State v. Dock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the type of assault prohibited by § 76-5-102.5 “requires a mens rea to cause bodily injury”
• instructions “taken as a whole” were “sufficient to inform the jury”
• prisoner allegedly attacked a guard with a broken jar causing minor facial cuts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garrett
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-02-26· cited 50×
• State v. Ricci
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-09-29· cited 10×
• State v. McKenna
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-10-30· cited 2×
• Pikyavit v. United States
  D. Utah· 2017-04-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Castillo
  Utah Supreme Court· 1969-07-23· cited 37×
• State v. Coleman
  Utah Supreme Court· 1965-10-06· cited 10×