State v. D.J.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• notice of work-related injury was sufficient where claimant notified employer that she suffered arm or wrist pain while working, that she could not work because of this condition and that she was unsure whether the condition was work related
• court held claimant complied with Section 312 where she initially complained to her supervisor of an injury, which kept her out of work, but only informed her employer that the injury was work-related several months later after she received that information from her physician
• court held claimant complied with Section 312 where she initially complained to her supervisor of an injury, which kept her out of work, but only informed her employer that the injury was work-related several months later after she received that information from her physician
• court noted that, although the claimant was not sure if her injury was work-related at the time of the injury, the employer was aware of the injury and the possibility it was work-related due to the claimant being injured while at work and immediately informing her supervisor
• court noted that, although the claimant was not sure if her injury was work-related at the time of the injury, the employer was aware of the injury and the possibility it was work- related due to the claimant being injured while at work and immediately informing her supervisor
• court noted that, although the 14 claimant was not sure if her injury was work related at the time of the injury, the employer was aware of the injury and the possibility it was work related due to the claimant being injured while at work and immediately informing her supervisor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).