Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/22/2024
State v. Dixon
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1077
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., vehicular assault, operating a motor vehicle without being in reasonable control, and speeding offenses that stemmed from same event were not the \same offense\ for double-jeopardy purposes. Although the evidence underlying the charges might overlap, the elements of the offenses do not, and the double-jeopardy analysis considers elements, not evidence.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Currier v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 148×
- State v. ZimaOhio Supreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 68×
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 50×
- State v. LearOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 5×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.